ENVION is the sixteenth biggest ICO ever and has raised $100 million through its tokenized crowdfunding. Huge number of individuals have contributed to propel ENVION’s concept of green mining. However, rather than fostering an item (while mining was as yet productive), the organizer groups are playing out a public fight about the control of the organization and the venture. Fintelegram has been writing about this case for quite some time.
Our Situation
Fintelegram has a reasonable perspective and indeed, an unmistakable inclination – we are favoring the a huge number of financial backers who are probably going to lose everything. Furthermore, we are favoring the entire crypto industry which relies upon legit entertainers. Subsequently, assuming that we uncover the disappointments and inadequacies of one side, we are not favoring one side with the other.
Most importantly, we might want to say that up to this point we have ordered and distributed a great deal of data that was extremely condemning of Matthias WOESTMANN’s establishing group. In addition to other things, we carried the subtleties to the foundation of the Canadian Huge. The article, including a graphical show of the specific circumstance, was posted on both the ENVION Organizers’ blog and the ENVION Financial backers’ blog (in the interim shut down for reasons unknown). Likewise the FinTelegram in Exploration Report #1 of Felix G. (see video) was given as a dependable wellspring of foundation data. This Felix G. is near the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW. In the interim, we have likewise brought truth based basic reports about the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW. To put it plainly, we have consistently examined the ENVION case with a basic distance and until this point, we have no private or monetary connections with any party. We additionally hold no EVN tokens and have no different irreconcilable circumstances.
The FinTelegram Survey
A couple of days prior we casted a ballot online on the inquiry “Who is to be faulted for the ICO wreck” regarding an article about the media exercises of the establishing groups. Immediately we were denounced by the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW and their “image heroes” by editorial and wire channels of having gotten cash from the “Middle class Wrongdoing” network around WOESTMANN and VAN AUBEL. What’s more, pioneer group representative Martin LAURENT approached his Image Champions to control the vote and furthermore gave the suitable directions, for example, erasing treats to have the option to cast a ballot on different occasions.
Subsequently, this control likewise occurred. After this source of inspiration, the consequence of the survey changed.
Before this source of inspiration, most of the members didn’t feel that the group around WOESTMANN would bear the fault for the ICO debacle. Around then, “as it were” 48% were of the electors said that WOESTMANN is fault for the ICO wreck. After Martin LAURENT’s allure, this situation has changed inside only a couple of hours and presently practically 55% of citizens accept that WOESTMANN and companions are at fault for this.
It is wonderful, in any case, that notwithstanding the monstrous preparation to control the vote and in spite of the serious media work that has been happening for a really long time, practically 45% still accept that either the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW (35%) or the two groups (10%) are to be faulted for ENVION’s ICO catastrophe.
End: in spite of huge endeavors to activate their fans, numerous financial backers and eyewitnesses are of the assessment that Michael LUCKOW’s establishing group isn’t so natural to fault. It can now, obviously, just be hypothesized what the outcome would resemble without the progressing campaigning of the establishing group.