ENVION is the sixteenth biggest ICO ever and has raised $100 million through its tokenized crowdfunding. Huge number of individuals have contributed to propel ENVION’s concept of green mining. In any case, rather than fostering an item (while mining was as yet beneficial), the organizer groups are playing out a public fight about the control of the organization and the task. Fintelegram has been writing about this case for a very long time.
Our Situation
Fintelegram has an unmistakable perspective and indeed, a reasonable inclination – we are favoring the a large number of financial backers who are probably going to lose everything. What’s more, we are agreeing with the entire crypto industry which relies upon legit entertainers. Subsequently, assuming we reveal the disappointments and deficiencies of one side, we are not favoring one side with the other.
We, most importantly, might want to say that up to this point we have incorporated and distributed a great deal of data that was exceptionally incredulous of Matthias WOESTMANN’s establishing group. In addition to other things, we carried the subtleties to the foundation of the Canadian Large. The article, including a graphical show of the unique circumstance, was posted on both the ENVION Pioneers’ blog and the ENVION Financial backers’ blog (in the interim shut down for reasons unknown). Additionally the FinTelegram in Exploration Report #1 of Felix G. (see video) was given as a solid wellspring of foundation data. This Felix G. is near the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW. In the interim, we have likewise brought truth based basic reports about the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW. To put it plainly, we have consistently investigated the ENVION case with a basic distance and until this point in time, we have no private or monetary connections with any party. We likewise hold no EVN tokens and have no different irreconcilable situations.
The FinTelegram Survey
A couple of days prior we casted a ballot online on the inquiry “Who is at fault for the ICO wreck” regarding an article about the media exercises of the establishing groups. Immediately we were charged by the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW and their “image fighters” by analysis and message channels of having gotten cash from the “Middle class Wrongdoing” network around WOESTMANN and VAN AUBEL. Furthermore, pioneer group representative Martin LAURENT approached his Image Fighters to control the vote and furthermore gave the suitable directions, for example, erasing treats to have the option to cast a ballot on numerous occasions.
Subsequently, this control additionally occurred. After this source of inspiration, the consequence of the survey changed.
Before this source of inspiration, most of the members didn’t feel that the group around WOESTMANN would bear the fault for the ICO fiasco. Around then, “as it were” 48% were of the citizens said that WOESTMANN is fault for the ICO wreck. After Martin LAURENT’s allure, this situation has changed inside only a couple of hours and presently practically 55% of electors accept that WOESTMANN and companions are at fault for this.
It is amazing, in any case, that in spite of the enormous preparation to control the vote and regardless of the serious media work that has been happening for quite a long time, practically 45% still accept that either the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW (35%) or the two groups (10%) are to be faulted for ENVION’s ICO debacle.
End: regardless of huge endeavors to prepare their fans, numerous financial backers and eyewitnesses are of the assessment that Michael LUCKOW’s establishing group isn’t so natural to fault. It can now, obviously, just be guessed what the outcome would resemble without the progressing campaigning of the establishing group.