ENVION is the sixteenth biggest ICO ever and has raised $100 million by means of its tokenized crowdfunding. Large number of individuals have contributed to propel ENVION’s concept of green mining. Yet, rather than fostering an item (while mining was as yet beneficial), the organizer groups are playing out a public fight about the control of the organization and the task. Fintelegram has been investigating this case for quite a long time.
Our Situation
Fintelegram has an unmistakable perspective and indeed, a reasonable predisposition – we are favoring the a large number of financial backers who are probably going to lose everything. Furthermore, we are agreeing with the entire crypto industry which relies upon legit entertainers. Subsequently, assuming that we uncover the disappointments and deficiencies of one side, we are not favoring one side with the other.
We, first of all, might want to say that up to this point we have incorporated and distributed a ton of data that was exceptionally incredulous of Matthias WOESTMANN’s establishing group. In addition to other things, we carried the subtleties to the foundation of the Canadian Large. The article, including a graphical show of the unique situation, was posted on both the ENVION Organizers’ blog and the ENVION Financial backers’ blog (in the mean time shut down for reasons unknown). Likewise the FinTelegram in Exploration Report #1 of Felix G. (see video) was given as a dependable wellspring of foundation data. This Felix G. is near the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW. In the mean time, we have likewise brought reality based basic reports about the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW. To put it plainly, we have consistently broke down the ENVION case with a basic distance and until this point, we have no private or monetary connections with any party. We likewise hold no EVN tokens and have no different irreconcilable circumstances.
The FinTelegram Survey
A couple of days prior we casted a ballot online on the inquiry “Who is at fault for the ICO wreck” regarding an article about the media exercises of the establishing groups. Immediately we were charged by the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW and their “image fighters” by discourse and message channels of having gotten cash from the “Middle class Wrongdoing” network around WOESTMANN and VAN AUBEL. What’s more, pioneer group representative Martin LAURENT approached his Image Champions to control the vote and furthermore gave the suitable directions, for example, erasing treats to have the option to cast a ballot on numerous occasions.
Thusly, this control additionally occurred. After this source of inspiration, the consequence of the survey changed.
Before this source of inspiration, most of the members didn’t imagine that the group around WOESTMANN would bear the fault for the ICO debacle. Around then, “as it were” 48% were of the citizens said that WOESTMANN is fault for the ICO wreck. After Martin LAURENT’s allure, this situation has changed inside only a couple of hours and presently practically 55% of citizens accept that WOESTMANN and companions are at fault for this.
It is amazing, notwithstanding, that in spite of the enormous activation to control the vote and regardless of the concentrated media work that has been happening for quite a long time, practically 45% still accept that either the establishing group around Michael LUCKOW (35%) or the two groups (10%) are to be faulted for ENVION’s ICO catastrophe.
End: in spite of huge endeavors to assemble their fans, numerous financial backers and spectators are of the assessment that Michael LUCKOW’s establishing group isn’t so natural to fault. It can now, obviously, just be guessed what the outcome would resemble without the continuous campaigning of the establishing group.